Re: Ordered Lists

I should also have mentioned that you version has the nested ol elements a
children of li elements, unlike the original, so it should validate unlike
the original.

Frank
----- Original Message -----
From: "Cindy Stanley, SSS WebWorks" <stanleysupport(at)prodigy.net>
To: "Frank Boumphrey" <bckman(at)ix.netcom.com>; <hwg-techniques(at)hwg.org>
Sent: Saturday, September 02, 2000 1:19 AM
Subject: Re: Ordered Lists


> Cindy Stanley wrote:
> >> <li> is a singleton tag, requiring no closing. The end tag is optional.
> >> Remove all your </li> and the document will validate under your
> > >transitional doctype.
> >>but, it does (validate)... go figure.
>
> From: Frank Boumphrey <bckman(at)ix.netcom.com>
> >then the validator you are using is wrong.
>
> hmmm ... I don't think so, at least not in my opinion :)
>
>  >Try using the W3C validator written incidently by an HWG member!
>
> "Incidently", that is the only validator *this HWG member* uses. I would
> have never mentioned it validated, if I hadn't checked w/ the W3C first.
>
> <http://www.ssswebworks.com/hwgoltest.htm>
>
> see for yourself
>
> --
> Cindy K. Stanley, SSS
> Stanley Support Service
>

HWG hwg-techniques mailing list archives, maintained by Webmasters @ IWA