Re: netscape. grrrrr...Ahhhhhh!
by "David Clapper" <dclapper(at)clioassociates.com>
|
Date: |
Tue, 25 Jul 2000 17:44:28 -0400 |
To: |
<hwg-techniques(at)hwg.org> |
References: |
net |
|
todo: View
Thread,
Original
|
|
Well, I came late to this discussion so I apologize if this info has already
been posted.
The Microsoft KB ( http://support.microsoft.com ) has several articles about
this:
Q245237 - Configuration to Enable the Netscape Browser Program to Function
Properly in a Proxy 2.0-Based Environment
Q218484 - Netscape Users Cannot Gain Access to Proxy Using Basic
Authentication
Q245165 - Microsoft Proxy 2.0 Client Configuration Scripts and Compatible
Browsers
Q178173 - Enabling Access Control in Web Proxy May Return a Blank Page
Hope this helps (or at least gets you pointed in the right direction).
David Clapper
Vice-President & Chief Architect
Clio Associates
70 Pavilion St.
Rochester, NY 14620 USA
Voice: +1.716.442.5407
Fax: +1.716.442.5993
Cell: +1.716.259.3699
e-mail: dclapper(at)clioassociates.com
PGP key ID: 0xC67E9E98
----- Original Message -----
From: KathyW <kathyw(at)home.albury.net.au>
To: <hwg-techniques(at)hwg.org>
Sent: Tuesday, July 25, 2000 4:44 PM
Subject: Re: netscape. grrrrr...Ahhhhhh!
> ** Reply to message from Rob Prentice <RJP(at)clickdms.com> on Tue, 25 Jul
2000
> 08:50:52 +0100
>
>
> > i cant
> > get on the net with netscape over the network because it doesnt like
> > M$proxy server2 for some reson.
>
> Or is it that "M$proxy server2" doesn't like Netscape and won't work with
it?
> Come on MS supporters - I've seen this question asked a number of times
now,
> and no answer. Does the silence mean M$proxy server2 *is* deliberately not
> working with NS? Or do people just not know/care?
>
> Curious,
> KathyW.
>
> Red Hat Linux 6.1 (kernel 2.2.14)
> Sun JDK1.2.2
> PolarBarMailer16b (beta/alpha ... what the heck, I like it ;-)
HWG hwg-techniques mailing list archives,
maintained by Webmasters @ IWA