Re: Browsers (was RE: Netscape frames problem)
by "Darrell King" <darrell(at)webctr.com>
|
Date: |
Wed, 5 Apr 2000 11:19:02 -0400 |
To: |
"HWG - Techniques" <hwg-techniques(at)hwg.org> |
References: |
army |
|
todo: View
Thread,
Original
|
|
AOL 6. Wonderful.
All I can say is that if they are going to go to all the trouble of using
the newset, most standards-compliant browser ever, they should also consider
ditching all the needless destruction during intallation, and opening their
"borders" to the world.
D
----- Original Message -----
From: Villano, Paul <VillanoP(at)usachcs-emh1.army.mil>
To: HWG - Techniques <hwg-techniques(at)hwg.org>
Sent: Wednesday, April 05, 2000 9:23 AM
Subject: RE: Browsers (was RE: Netscape frames problem)
Remember, we're dealing with AOL here, people. (And yes, I have an AOL
account!) The confusion is probably arising over the distinction between
*AOL* version 5 (out now with a version of NS4 browser) and an updated
version of NS to come out (NS5) which would make it AOL 6. Are we confused
yet? :)
Paul
"Steer toward the horizon...toward Heaven and Home!"
-----Original Message-----
From: Shannon Doyle [mailto:shannon(at)oztek.net.au]
Sent: Tuesday, April 04, 2000 9:25 AM
To: HWG - Techniques
Subject: Re: Browsers (was RE: Netscape frames problem)
>
> > No, AFAIR AOL announced that they would be releasing NS 6 not 5. Looks
like
> > they are trying to get ahead of IE :-).
Actually, it is my understanding that Netscape refer to their release of
the browser source code as their version 5. Not entirely sure on this, but
I have heard it in quite a few places and from quite a few different people.
- Shannon
HWG hwg-techniques mailing list archives,
maintained by Webmasters @ IWA