Mike,
I'm sure that some one has corrected you already, but PHP has powerful
support fot Includes, much better than ASP or any of the other languages
via. the include() function which is one of the reasons PHP is my favorite!!

Frank

Frank Boumphrey
(Latest Book co-authored 'XML.NET Developers Guide' from Syngress Press by
Sills, Boumphrey and Ortiz)

----- Original Message -----
From: "Mike Taylor" <lonewolf(at)one.net>
To: "Hank Marquardt" <hmarq(at)yerpso.net>
Cc: <hwg-techniques(at)hwg.org>
Sent: Monday, May 13, 2002 10:40 PM
Subject: Re: CFM vs ASP


> I like PHP, but here's something that really bothers me about it:
>
> You can't combine SSI and PHP in the same page.  So if you had a global
> include file that contains, say, a navigation bar that you don't want to
> have to repeat in every page, then you can't do it in PHP unless you
happen
> to have the module version of PHP (where you can just use the virtual()
> fuction).  The CGI version won't let you do it.  Unfortunately, my
provider
> uses the CGI version.
>
> If I use ASP, includes can be used ad nauseum.
>
> Mike
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Hank Marquardt" <hmarq(at)yerpso.net>
> To: "Gibson, Timmi" <timmig(at)verbatim.com.au>
> Cc: <hwg-techniques(at)hwg.org>
> Sent: Sunday, May 12, 2002 8:11 PM
> Subject: Re: CFM vs ASP
>
>
> > I'm pretty sure you've used google before ... I'd do so now:)
> >
> > If you really want a balanced view you'd probably need to include a few
> > more choices even if you don't have a developer pushing them at the
> > moment --
> >
> > PHP
> > JSP
> > Perl
> > Python/Zope
> >
> > I'm PHP biased myself -- here's a couple links (they're a little stale,
> > but worth reading):
> >
> > http://php.weblogs.com/php_vs_asp
> > http://php.weblogs.com/php_vs_cold_fusion
> >
> > HTH
> >
> >
> > On Mon, May 13, 2002 at 08:45:08AM +1000, Gibson, Timmi wrote:
> > > Hi there everyone
> > >
> > > We are in the process of having our website overhauled - changing from
> > > static HTML pages to a dynamic database driven website. Out of the
> > > developers we are looking at to assist with the project wants to use
> > > Cold Fusion and the other ASP. My boss has asked me to research the
> > > strengths/weaknesses and advantages/disadvantages of each.
> > >
> > > I have found lots of stuff on why you would use CFM over ASP
(Macromedia
> > > has lots of info) but not many that say the other way around. I
couldn't
> > > find anything on the Microsoft website comparing the 2 products. To
make
> > > sure I present a balanced view and so he doesn't accuse me of being
> > > biased could those of you in the know please either give me your
> > > thoughts or point me to some reference material that would help.
> > >
> > > Thanks!
> > >
> > > Timmi Gibson
> > > Marketing Communications Coordinator
> > > Verbatim Australia
> > > Ph 61 3 9823 0905
> > > Fax 61 3 9824 7011
> > > Web http://www.verbatim.com.au
> >
> > --
> > Hank Marquardt <hank(at)yerpso.net>
> > http://web.yerpso.net
> > GPG Id: 2BB5E60C
> > Fingerprint: D807 61BC FD18 370A AC1D  3EDF 2BF9 8A2D 2BB5 E60C
> > *** Beginning PHP && PHP II -- Starting May 20, 2002
> > *** See /services/classes
>

• Web Designer Courses
• Off the Shelf Training Courses

HWG hwg-techniques mailing list archives, maintained by Webmasters @ IWA