Re: Ordered Lists

by "Darrell King" <darrell(at)webctr.com>

 Date:  Sat, 2 Sep 2000 07:48:08 -0400
 To:  <hwg-techniques(at)hwg.org>
 References:  default
  todo: View Thread, Original
I think the correct solution was posted earlier:

<.ol>
<.li>Outer list<./li>
<.li>
       <.ol>
       <.li>inner list<./li>
       <.ol>
<./li>
<.li>Outer list again<./li>
<./ol>

Note that the inner list os contained within an li of the outer list.

D

----- Original Message -----
From: "Cindy Stanley, SSS WebWorks" <stanleysupport(at)prodigy.net>
To: "Frank Boumphrey" <bckman(at)ix.netcom.com>; <hwg-techniques(at)hwg.org>
Sent: Saturday, September 02, 2000 2:01 AM
Subject: Re: Ordered Lists


From: Cindy Stanley

>> Exactly, but my point being "you will validate by opting *not* to use
>> the end li tag" in the transitional 4.0 doctype.


From: Frank Boumphrey <bckman(at)ix.netcom.com>
>But you should still validate whether you put them in or leave them out. If
>you don't then the validator is wrong

The original document in question:
<http://www.wi-easterseals.org/toc.htm>
did not validate when using </li> tags in the validator at the W3C

When I took out the </li> tags (and that's all I did to the original):
<http://www.ssswebworks.com/hwgoltest.htm>
the document validated at the W3C.

That is why I suggested taking out the </li>'s to validate the document.

--
Cindy K. Stanley, SSS
Stanley Support Service

HWG hwg-techniques mailing list archives, maintained by Webmasters @ IWA