Re: htm and html extensions
by "Gary Krockover" <gary(at)garykrockover.com>
|
Date: |
Thu, 18 Jul 2002 13:38:20 -0500 |
To: |
<hwg-techniques(at)hwg.org> |
References: |
rr |
|
todo: View
Thread,
Original
|
|
It's always been this way. www.usworks.com/jacksonville is a sub-directory
or folder on the server, not a specific page. Servers are set to display a
page by default when none are specified, typically index.html or index.htm
or home.htm or the like. So, by going to www.usworks.com/jacksonville the
server then defaults to the homepage, index.html for example.
Gary Krockover
Webmaster
Internet Gateway
www.thegateway.net
(512) 930-1022
> Hello,
> I have been exposed to something recently that does not fit my prior
> training. My wife works for a high-tech firm that has many servers
> addressing a wide range of clients - Internet, not Intranet, around the
> USA. The firm has dropped all .htm and .html extensions when referring a
> client to a site file. Check it out at www.usworks.com/jacksonville
>
> Somehow, I was trained that proper file access would require *.htm or
> .html* after "jacksonville."
>
> I have run a few tests on the back-end of my own servers and, sure enough,
> www.my-choice.com/8884360 will access a test page - graphic (clock).
When,
> if ever, did the browsers/URL data access world change to the point where
> no htm or html is required after the server file? Perhaps it has always
> been this way and I simply assumed htm or html was required for proper
file
> access. Any feedback will be quite helpful. Incidentally, I sent the
> my-choice link to about 60 people (all browser, OSs, and even AOL folks)
> and all replied stating they could access the clock via my test page.
BTW,
> I'm delighted with this given a venture we are starting, but I want to
> ensure that I am not laboring under some bizarre delusion or freak
> tweak. Trying to understand?
> TIA
> Ralph Rasmussen
>
HWG hwg-techniques mailing list archives,
maintained by Webmasters @ IWA