Re: Coding
by "Lisa H" <nstar92(at)bellatlantic.net>
|
Date: |
Sat, 4 Nov 2000 22:56:18 -0600 |
To: |
"Raymond Mosley" <rmosley(at)sprynet.com>, <hwg-techniques(at)hwg.org> |
References: |
netstoremail hwg quicksilver raymond |
|
todo: View
Thread,
Original
|
|
yews, yes, yes! But I think the issue here is who can pee farther now???
----- Original Message -----
From: "Raymond Mosley" <rmosley(at)sprynet.com>
To: <hwg-techniques(at)hwg.org>
Sent: Thursday, November 02, 2000 12:54 PM
Subject: Re: Coding
| > I wonder if we all chasing our tails, wasting time in making sure that
| > coding works in every browser.
| > I'm a content provider - I want to present my content to as wide an
| > audience as possible.
|
| If you want to present your content to as wide an audience as possible,
| doesn't it then follow that you should do the best you can to make sure
your
| code works in "every" browser? As far as the never-ending issues with
| Microsoft, Netscape, Opera, et. al., are concerned, isn't it the challenge
| of anybody who writes code to write to their anticipated audience,
whatever
| browser/ platform/ resolution they may use. I just got off the phone with
a
| client who complained about my perfect graphics - I asked him what he was
| using to look at them, as he said, "AOL." Well, there you go - we all know
| what happens to graphics in AOL...but what do we do, refuse to deal with
AOL
| issues?
|
| Raymond Mosley
| Calinard Enterprises
|
|
HWG hwg-techniques mailing list archives,
maintained by Webmasters @ IWA