Re: HTML / XHTML
by "Tim Rivera" <lists(at)timrivera.com>
|
Date: |
Sun, 16 Nov 2003 23:12:33 -0500 |
To: |
<hwg-techniques(at)hwg.org> |
References: |
upsdell |
|
todo: View
Thread,
Original
|
|
> > Most {?} Web pages are in HTML4, I am trying to stick to XHTML
> > Transitional. Comments on the goodness or problems with that approach
> > welcomed.
>
> Many argue that xHTML should not be used because (a) they assert that there
> is no special advantage to using it, and (b) many browsers -- notably IE --
> don't support xHTML.
>
> although many browsers do not support xHTML, those that don't support it will
> accept xHTML, rendering pages as they would any HTML pages.
To my knowledge, there is not a browser that "does not support" XHTML. Any
browser that renders HTML will support/render XHTML. XHTML is simply a strict
form of HTML, which requires all lower case letters and closing tags. I can't
really think of any "advantage" of using XHTML, as it is rendered exactly the
same as HTML. The difference is just the strictness of the valid, well-formed
structure of the markup. I personally like to use XHTML Strict for markup and
CSS for all styling.
I think perhaps Charles was thinking of XML, which is neither supported nor
rendered by IE.
Tim
--
____________________________________________________________
http://webdesign.meetup.com/ See you at the next meetup!
http://css.meetup.com/
HWG hwg-techniques mailing list archives,
maintained by Webmasters @ IWA