Re: reply to???

by "Paul Roberts" <roberts_paul(at)bigfoot.com>

 Date:  Tue, 13 Jun 2000 22:59:55 +0100
 To:  "Rob Prentice" <RJP(at)clickdms.com>,
<hwg-techniques(at)hwg.org>
 References:  hwg
  todo: View Thread, Original
1. Try Reply All and take out the personal ones.

2. You could try filtering on just hwg-techniques and for to and/or cc I
find this catches most of them.


Paul Roberts

roberts_paul(at)bigfoot.com


----- Original Message -----
From: Rob Prentice <RJP(at)clickdms.com>
To: <hwg-techniques(at)hwg.org>
Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2000 10:36 AM
Subject: reply to???


> i use outlook at work. and when i try to reply to a post it comes up
> with the persons personal email address. why? why cant the email server
> that the posts go through set the reply to address as
> hwg-techniques(at)hwg.org like all the other lists im a member of? like the
> Director group. makes life easyer.
> because of this i dont bother to reply to posts. because ill forget to
> change the address im sending it to and i dont want to send replies to
> personal addresses. ive done it twice so far on this list. also, i dont
> bother sending any. because if i have to reply to someone who answered
> my post it my go private. and that is so annoying. also, the filters in
> outlook are a bit naff. i told it that every email with
> hwg-techniques(at)hwg.org anywhere in the header should be placed into
> another folder. it doesnt do it. why? ive tried to filter messages and
> it wont do it properly.
> who do i write to to get the 'reply to' thing sorted out? or atleast for
> the list server to do something with the header so outlook can
> understand what to do with it.
> is anyone else having this arsey problem with the reply to? or is it
> just me?
>
>
>      Rob.
>
>

HWG hwg-techniques mailing list archives, maintained by Webmasters @ IWA