Re: IE 6 - Opinions?
by "Dusty" <designsbydusty(at)tiadon.com>
|
Date: |
Thu, 27 Jun 2002 19:54:22 -0500 |
To: |
<hwg-techniques(at)hwg.org> |
References: |
upsdell |
|
todo: View
Thread,
Original
|
|
Speaking strictly as a user, I can't tell any difference between it and the
older version that I had.
Dusty
----- Original Message -----
From: "Charles A Upsdell" <cupsdell(at)upsdell.com>
To: <hwg-techniques(at)hwg.org>
Cc: "Adrian Harris" <adrian(at)gn.apc.org>
Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 3:01 PM
Subject: Re: IE 6 - Opinions?
> Adrian:
>
> I will speak from two perspectives: as a user, and as a designer.
>
> As a user, I find IE6 more flaky than the latest version of 5.5: IE craps
> out more often than 5.5, and exhibits some clear bugs. Hopefully the
> upcoming service pack will fix most of this. Check my weekly newsletter,
> the Browser News, to find out when it becomes available.
>
> As a designer, I always specify a DOCTYPE, which (as you know) makes IE6
> apply the standards more strictly. This has not been a problem for me, as
> I have always coded for the standards, and I have been testing my sites
> with Mozilla (which is likewise very strict) for over two years. I do get
> a bit frustrated sometimes, however, because in some ways IE6 does not
> comply with standards as well as Mozilla does: IE6 is my main browser,
but
> I have to flip to Mozilla fairly often to test things which today work
> properly only with Mozilla.
>
> [] HTH, Chuck Upsdell
>
> At 02:43 PM 06/27/02, you wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> >I've just downloaded IE 6 and wondered what opinions folk had about it.
> >Reports I've read are promising - good support for standards and nothing
to
> >scary as far as older code is concerned as long as your doctypes are up
to
> >scratch.
> >Hotwired and CNET both have reviews.
> >
> >Cheers,
> >Adrian
>
> -
> Chuck Upsdell
> Email: cupsdell(at)upsdell.com
> Website: http://www.upsdell.com/
>
>
HWG hwg-techniques mailing list archives,
maintained by Webmasters @ IWA