Re: SHTML
by "Rudy Gomez" <rudy(at)cyberangler.com>
|
Date: |
Wed, 9 Jan 2002 12:48:09 -0500 |
To: |
"Paul Wilson" <webguroo(at)tampabay.rr.com> |
Cc: |
<hwg-techniques(at)hwg.org> |
References: |
louisville WORKGROUP |
|
todo: View
Thread,
Original
|
|
One possible problem is if you have many web pages already established
within the search engines. When you change for example, from foo.html, to
foo.shtml, the .shtml page would be considered a new page in the search
engines.
This happened to me a long time ago and my host at the time was nice enough
to adjust my apache configuration to parse .html files. Therefore, all my
existing .html pages were then parsed as if they were .shtml files.... I
was able to use SSIs without changing the file names.
God Bless America,
Rudy Gomez \ ,,,,,,\\,, ...><`>
rudy(at)cyberangler.com }><(((((())))�� ...><`>
http://cyberangler.com/ / `````//'' ...><`>
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> Does anyone know if any of the search engines penalize you for
> using it? I looked at
> SearchEngineWatch and could not find any refernces.
>
> Paul Wilson
> webguroo(at)tampabay.rr.com
>
>
HWG hwg-techniques mailing list archives,
maintained by Webmasters @ IWA