Re: Re[2]: AOL
by "Darrell King" <darrell(at)webctr.com>
|
Date: |
Wed, 26 Jun 2002 10:35:42 -0400 |
To: |
<hwg-techniques(at)hwg.org> |
References: |
|
|
todo: View
Thread,
Original
|
|
Funny...Mozilla 1.0 (which is not Netscape 6.x, although that latter is
based on Mozilla's engine) never crashes for me...it's a damn fine browser
so far, and a really impressive effort on the part of the team behind it. I
consider it to be friendlier and more reliable than Opera, a match for IE
and far better than NN4 (for me - sorry, cbirds!) on my Linux machines. The
email client seems as versatile as any of it's commercially available
counterparts and the W3C support is certainly among the best currently on
the market.
I really find it hard to see where to criticize this software? Bugs it may
have - all applications do - but it has grown from a near-death blow to the
point where it can be a major contender in the browser market while still
remaining Open Source! It provides Netscape 4 fans with an MS-free upgrade
path (for those who want one!), and gives many different markets (handhelds
and AOL come to mind) a second choice over IE for their browser.
Just my opinion, but I happy that the Mozilla project managed to hang in
there against all odds and finally give us this great Open Source
application.
D
----- Original Message -----
From: cbirds
Kid Stevens hunted and pecked out this message on 6/26/2002 9:56 AM
>cough Mozilla cough happens to be cough Netscape cough. Same lousy
>performance, same crashes same code and same ridiculous Quality Feedback
>Agent
Which "Netscape"? The original Netscape (4.7.9) never crashes for me.
HWG hwg-techniques mailing list archives,
maintained by Webmasters @ IWA