RE: One Cookie/Multiple Domains

by "Brian A. Sayrs" <sayrs(at)southwindsolutions.com>

 Date:  Mon, 1 May 2000 11:08:19 -0700
 To:  "'Harold A. Driscoll'" <harold(at)driscoll.chi.il.us>
 Cc:  "'Kehvan M. Zydhek'" <kehvan(at)zydhek.net>, David Clapper <dclapper(at)clioassociates.com>, "hwg-techniques(at)hwg.org" <hwg-techniques(at)hwg.org>
  todo: View Thread, Original
-----Original Message-----
From:	Harold A. Driscoll [SMTP:harold(at)driscoll.chi.il.us]
Sent:	Monday, May 01, 2000 10:47 AM
To:	Brian A. Sayrs
Cc:	'Kehvan M. Zydhek'; David Clapper; hwg-techniques(at)hwg.org
Subject:	RE: One Cookie/Multiple Domains

At 21:32 30-04-00 , Brian A. Sayrs wrote:
>Now, if you are using Perl to generate cookies, it's=20
>actually not that difficult:  just set two cookies, one=20
>for each domain. =20

If you are using country-code gTLD, you may actually be able to get by =
with
a single cookie. Forget for a moment what the cookie specification
promised, and read carefully what it actually provides. (Hint, the =
counting
of periods). Also realize that popular implementations are even looser.

Safe computing (hopefully not at others' expense, grin),  /Harold
-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=
=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-
Harold A. Driscoll                 mailto:Harold(at)Driscoll.Chi.IL.US
#include <std/disclaimer>                 http://Driscoll.Chi.IL.US


Actually, the fact that popular implementations are unpredictable is why =
I insist on having two cookies:  it prevents them from misinterpreting =
your intentions.

Brian

HWG hwg-techniques mailing list archives, maintained by Webmasters @ IWA

This page is part of a preserved archive of archives.hwg.org. The site is no longer active and its content is not maintained. For enquiries about this archive, write to archive(at)iwanet.org.