Re: map regions yes/no?
by "Cindy Stanley, SSS WebWorks" <stanleysupport(at)prodigy.net>
|
| Date: |
Mon, 28 Aug 2000 21:59:39 -0400 |
| To: |
<hwg-techniques(at)hwg.org> |
| |
todo: View
Thread,
Original
|
|
Cindy Stanley <stanleysupport(at)prodigy.net> wrote;
>>Also, there are client-side imagemaps, which
>> will work with the newer browsers, but for backwards compatibility, it's
>> best to go with server-side image maps.
From: Frank Boumphrey <bckman(at)ix.netcom.com>
>I would beg to differ. Client side image maps will now work on 97% of
>browsers, they are faster than server side maps, and require no complex
>coding.
Thanks for the correction Frank. My resources show that server-side image
maps are best for backward compatibility, and now that I stand corrected,
client-side image maps *are not supported in pre 3.x browsers*. You are
right about "faster than server-side" for they use no processing time. Here
is a url to learn how to create a client-side image map:
<http://www.projectcool.com/developer/basics/imagemaps/02B-clientmap.html>
--
Cindy K. Stanley, SSS
Stanley Support Service
HWG hwg-techniques mailing list archives,
maintained by Webmasters @ IWA