Re: Page load times

by "Norman Bunn" <norman.bunn(at)craftedsolutions.com>

 Date:  Wed, 21 Feb 2001 17:07:17 -0500
 To:  "BigGrizzly" <grizzlygraphics(at)mindspring.com>,
"hwg-techniques List" <hwg-techniques(at)hwg.org>
 References:  smginc oemcomputer
  todo: View Thread, Original
I usually check my page sizes using this Bookmarklet and try to keep each
page under 35K.

javascript:var%20fs=0;var%20f=1;var%20p='';for(i=0;i<document.images.length;
i++){if(p.indexOf('('+document.images(i).src+')')<0)fs=fs+parseInt(document.
images(i).fileSize);p=p+'('+document.images(i).src+')';};fs=fs+parseInt(docu
ment.fileSize);fs=fs+'';for(i=fs.length-1;i>0;i--){if(f/3==Math.ceil(f/3)){f
s=fs.substring(0,%20i)+','+fs.substring(i,fs.length);}f++;}alert('This%20pag
e%20weighs%20'+fs+'%20bytes.');

Can't remember where I picked this up, so I just posted the source.

Norman
www.craftedsolutions.com

----- Original Message -----
From: BigGrizzly <grizzlygraphics(at)mindspring.com>
Subject: Re: Page load times


> When you are considering load times below 10 to 15 seconds is this at 28.8
> or 56k speeds?
>
> Don

HWG hwg-techniques mailing list archives, maintained by Webmasters @ IWA

This page is part of a preserved archive of archives.hwg.org. The site is no longer active and its content is not maintained. For enquiries about this archive, write to archive(at)iwanet.org.