Re: Table Width/Heights

Nathan, it's not as confusing when you type it as you say you think it is.
;^ )
Yeah, I thought you meant appearing at all four corners at once. Even then
screen res. wouldn't allow for whether a user has things like the quick
launch or address bars up.
I should add that I code pages for 800 x 600 (as others have said too),  &
with a quick launch & all the top bars (address, etc.). I believe that gives
me the most common screen res. with (almost) the smallest area that would be
visible. Then I test in other resolutions & make any changes that are
needed. I frequently find sites that have a left frame without a scroll bar
& the links go below the quick-launch. Most of which are made for larger
screen resolutions......
~ Paul


----- Original Message -----
From: "Nathan" <natelyle(at)chartermi.net>
To: "Angel One" <angelone(at)angelonearth.net>
Cc: "HWG Techniques Email List" <hwg-techniques(at)hwg.org>
Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 10:35 PM
Subject: Re: Table Width/Heights


> >BTW Nathan - seems to me you'd have to sniff out the screen res & make
> >separate pages in order for the graphics to locate themselves in each
> >corner.....
>
> Left and right aren't a problem. And in the sense I'm usually trying to
use
> it, the height doesn't have to match a screen size so much as just always
> be at the bottom, whether the bottom of the page is available right away
or
> not. (With smaller screens, being against the bottom is guaranteed because
> of content causing scrolling, but a large screen may not need the
> scrolling, and then the bottom would appear somewhere above the bottom.)
> That sounds more confusing when I type it than I think it is. :)
>
> ~Nathan Lyle
> E-mail: natelyle(at)chartermi.net
> Web: http://www.nathanlyle.com
> Phone: (906)485-4806
>
>
> "The eye sees only what the mind is prepared to comprehend." - Henri
> Bergson (1859-1941) - French philosopher
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

HWG hwg-techniques mailing list archives, maintained by Webmasters @ IWA