Re: publishing from a database (MS Access Database)

by "Frank Boumphrey" <bckman(at)ix.netcom.com>

 Date:  Wed, 12 Sep 2001 16:25:39 -0400
 To:  <peter.schonefeld(at)bigpond.com>,
"Hank Marquardt" <hmarq(at)yerpso.net>
 Cc:  <hwg-techniques(at)mail.hwg.org>
 References:  bigpond
  todo: View Thread, Original
Access works just fine if you are expecting less than 50 people to be logged
on at the same time (I believe the 'official' limit is 255, but I wouldn't
want to test that number:>)

Actually if you develop in Access you can always upgrade to SQL server at a
later date.

Frank
----- Original Message -----
From: "Peter Schonefeld" <peter.schonefeld(at)bigpond.com>
To: "Hank Marquardt" <hmarq(at)yerpso.net>
Cc: <hwg-techniques(at)mail.hwg.org>
Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 9:49 PM
Subject: RE: publishing from a database (MS Access Database)


> Hi,
>
> I must agree that MS Access is not an industrial strength
> database, but i have seen it used as the data store for
> applications (web, network or standalone) for the best part
> of a decade.
>
> In my experience, if the site load is relatively low and the
> database is backed up, compacted and repaired on a regular
> basis, Access will do the job.  The way you code can also
> have an effect on the database performance.
>
> Having said that, i make certain that when entering into a
> contract involving Access development that i explain that
> the database is the weak link in the application - Have you
> considered installing MS SQL Server?
>
> In terms of standard SQL syntax and functionality (not
> performance and reliability) MS Access will handle most
> needs.  But, if you need to tap into the programming power
> of SQL, move to something fully featured.
>
> This link points to an objective discussion on the topic...
> http://www.15seconds.com/issue/010514.htm
>
> I hate to sit on the fence, but there is a place for
> database solutions like MS Access on the web and i would not
> discourage anyone from investigating their utility.
>
> That's my $0.02AUD on databases - and i hope you don't see
> that as being worth half the value of $0.02US opinion ;)
>
> Regards
> Peter Schonefeld
> Web Developer
> http://digitalcraft.com.au
>
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-hwg-techniques(at)hwg.org
> > [mailto:owner-hwg-techniques(at)hwg.org]On Behalf Of
> > Hank Marquardt
> > Sent: Monday, 10 September 2001 9:59 PM
> > To: Peter Schonefeld
> > Cc: Hank Marquardt; hwg-techniques(at)mail.hwg.org
> > Subject: Re: publishing from a database (MS
> > Access Database)
> >
> >
> > OK, I editorialized more than I should have an
> > now I must pay --
> >
> > Access has two problems --
> >
> > First, it has long become much too complex to be
> > a true end user
> > database -- something it was probably good at
> > once upon a time.
> >
> > Second, it's nowhere near robust enough from a
> > speed, scaleablilty,
> > reliability standpoint to do real work even at
> > the workgroup level.
> >
> > So what's left? ... I guess you could prototype in it.
> >
> > ... and since I've shown my bias already, I
> > expect any links I provide
> > would be seen as biased; but go use google and
> > look for "Access vs. Mysql"
> > or "Assess vs. SQL Server" or "Access Data
> > Corruption" or "Access User Load"
> > or even go look at the MS bugs database in the
> > Access section.
> >
> > ... then ask yourself if you can think of a
> > single web site that has both
> > significant traffic (>10000 hits day) AND even
> > 99.9 uptime (remember,
> > clustered dbs of important stuff would be 99.999
> > uptime) that uses Access
> > as a backend ... if you can think of one, let me know:)
> >
> > I think someone else mentioned it being an
> > inexpensive platform -- seems to me
> > there are free alternatives out there; even for
> > windows platforms that
> > perform better ...
> >
> > and so you don't think I'm just an 'open source
> > nut' ... if you want to stay
> > on an MS platform, SQL Server is a perfectly
> > servicable platform, use it and
> > be happy, at least it was designed to be a
> > database and functions accordingly.
> >
> > So none of that helps the original poster solve
> > his problem, but it's my
> > $0.02US on databases.
> >
> > Hank
> >
> > On Mon, Sep 10, 2001 at 02:19:33PM +1000, Peter
> > Schonefeld wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: owner-hwg-techniques(at)hwg.org
> > > > [mailto:owner-hwg-techniques(at)hwg.org]On Behalf Of
> > > > Hank Marquardt
> > > > Sent: Monday, 10 September 2001 10:19 AM
> > > > To: Duane Ruth-Heffelbower
> > > > Cc: hwg-techniques(at)mail.hwg.org
> > > <Hank>
> > > > Convert the whole darned ap to a real sql
> > > > database (of which I don't consider
> > > > Access)
> > > </Hank>
> > >
> > > Hmmm, A big punch in the face to MS Access.
> > I'm wondering
> > > what it did to deserve that ;)
> > >
> > > Hank, why don't you consider Access a "real SQL
> > database"?
> > >
> > > Regards
> > > Peter
> > >
> > > -- longest to do, but then updates would
> > > > be real time (or staged with
> > > > permission/publication); whether this is a good
> > > > idea really depends on how
> > > > the workload is spread between web and non-web
> > > > interactions ... though a little
> > > > server box on an intranet bridges the need quite
> > > > nicely as well.
> > > >
> > > > From a dataset size perspective, 400 records in
> > > > nothing and well within what
> > > > even access can handle but if you're going to let
> > > > the world bang on it and look
> > > > at it I think you want something more robust.
> > > >
> > > > HTH
> > > >
> > > > Hank
> > > >
> > > > On Sat, Sep 08, 2001 at 09:36:57PM -0500, Duane
> > > > Ruth-Heffelbower wrote:
> > > > > I do the web work for a non-profit with about
> > > > 400 members who are kept track
> > > > > of in an Access database. The group wants to
> > > > make some of the membership
> > > > > info available on the web, names, areas of
> > > > practice and contact info. I have
> > > > > not done a database to web piece before. What
> > > > would be the best way to
> > > > > handle it, assuming updates a few times a year?
> > > > > __________________________________________________
> > > > > Duane Ruth-Heffelbower, Webmaster
> > > > > www.voma.org, www.vorp.org
> > > > > www.fresno.edu/pacs/
> > www.RestorativeJusticeProject.org
> > > > > www.RJInternational.org
> > > > > www.EmpoweringForReconciliation.org
> > > > > www.ukdw.ac.id/lpip/pspp
> > > > > www.peacemaking.com  www.duanerh.iwarp.com
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Hank Marquardt <hank(at)yerpso.net>
> > > > http://web.yerpso.net
> > > >
> > > > Web & Database Development in PHP, MySQL/PostgreSQL
> > > > Small Office Networking Solutions - Debian
> > > > GNU/Linux & FreeBSD
> > > > PHP Instructor - HTML Writers Guild
> > </>
> > > > *** Beginning PHP -- Starts August 20, 2001
> > > > *** /services/classes/p171.3.html
> > > >
> > > >
> >
> > --
> > Hank Marquardt <hank(at)yerpso.net>
> > http://web.yerpso.net
> >
> > Web & Database Development in PHP, MySQL/PostgreSQL
> > Small Office Networking Solutions - Debian
> > GNU/Linux & FreeBSD
> > PHP Instructor - HTML Writers Guild </>
> > *** Beginning PHP -- Starts August 20, 2001
> > *** /services/classes/p171.3.html
> >
>

HWG hwg-techniques mailing list archives, maintained by Webmasters @ IWA

This page is part of a preserved archive of archives.hwg.org. The site is no longer active and its content is not maintained. For enquiries about this archive, write to archive(at)iwanet.org.