Re: Explain this please.

by "Darrell King" <darrell(at)webctr.com>

Date:	Sun, 26 May 2002 16:26:05 -0400
To:	<hwg-techniques(at)hwg.org>
References:	ntlworld ntlworld2
	todo: View Thread, Original

OK...I'm sure you heard me sighing over that one.  I was a bit confused and
on my way back to w3.org...:).
She is trying for XHTML Transitional, I believe.

D

----- Original Message -----
From: "Andrew McFarland" <aamcf(at)aamcf.co.uk>
To: <hwg-techniques(at)hwg.org>
Sent: Sunday, May 26, 2002 4:05 PM
Subject: Re: Explain this please.

At 15:44 26/05/02 -0400, Darrell King wrote:
>So, this means that empty elements (such as meta and link tags) should not
>be closed within the head section?  Or are they not classed as empty
>elements?

In HTML empty elements should not be closed in the HEAD.

In XHTML they MUST be. This is one of the differences between the two.

Andrew

--
http://aamcf.co.uk/

HWG hwg-techniques mailing list archives, maintained by Webmasters @ IWA