Re: WinNT 4.0/PWS vs Win2K/???

by "Kathleen Anderson" <kathleen(at)spiderwebwoman.com>

 Date:  Wed, 21 Nov 2001 19:33:22 -0500
 To:  <pjkmecak(at)snet.net>,
"hwg-tech" <hwg-techniques(at)hwg.org>
 References:  snet
  todo: View Thread, Original
Run IIS 5.0 Instead of PWS on Windows 2000 Professional
http://support.microsoft.com/support/kb/articles/Q262/6/32.ASP

It has the same 10 concurrent connection limit as PWS.


~ Kathleen Anderson
Spider Web Woman Designs
http://www.spiderwebwoman.com
email: kathleen(at)spiderwebwoman.com


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Paul Kmecak" <pjkmecak(at)snet.net>
To: "hwg-tech" <hwg-techniques(at)hwg.org>
Sent: November 21, 2001 6:47 PM
Subject: WinNT 4.0/PWS vs Win2K/???


> Hi, all.
> 
> It's finally time for me to rebuild my Windows NT 4.0 Workstation
> machine from scratch  I currently run Personal Web Server so I can test
> stuff locally before I post it to the "real" world.
> 
> I did get an Upgrade copy of Win2K Professional because I considered
> doing a very basic WinNT install and then upgrading to Win2K.  However,
> AFAIK, PWS doesn't work in Win2K and Internet Information Server
> requires WinNT/2K Server to run.  Since I've got just the one computer,
> I figured Win2K Server was overkill resource-wise and financially.
> 
> So, is there anything analogous to PWS for Win2K Professional?  Thanks
> in advance for any help and advice.
> 
> Paul Kmecak
> 
> 

HWG hwg-techniques mailing list archives, maintained by Webmasters @ IWA