Re: WinNT 4.0/PWS vs Win2K/???
by "Kathleen Anderson" <kathleen(at)spiderwebwoman.com>
|
Date: |
Wed, 21 Nov 2001 19:33:22 -0500 |
To: |
<pjkmecak(at)snet.net>, "hwg-tech" <hwg-techniques(at)hwg.org> |
References: |
snet |
|
todo: View
Thread,
Original
|
|
Run IIS 5.0 Instead of PWS on Windows 2000 Professional
http://support.microsoft.com/support/kb/articles/Q262/6/32.ASP
It has the same 10 concurrent connection limit as PWS.
~ Kathleen Anderson
Spider Web Woman Designs
http://www.spiderwebwoman.com
email: kathleen(at)spiderwebwoman.com
----- Original Message -----
From: "Paul Kmecak" <pjkmecak(at)snet.net>
To: "hwg-tech" <hwg-techniques(at)hwg.org>
Sent: November 21, 2001 6:47 PM
Subject: WinNT 4.0/PWS vs Win2K/???
> Hi, all.
>
> It's finally time for me to rebuild my Windows NT 4.0 Workstation
> machine from scratch I currently run Personal Web Server so I can test
> stuff locally before I post it to the "real" world.
>
> I did get an Upgrade copy of Win2K Professional because I considered
> doing a very basic WinNT install and then upgrading to Win2K. However,
> AFAIK, PWS doesn't work in Win2K and Internet Information Server
> requires WinNT/2K Server to run. Since I've got just the one computer,
> I figured Win2K Server was overkill resource-wise and financially.
>
> So, is there anything analogous to PWS for Win2K Professional? Thanks
> in advance for any help and advice.
>
> Paul Kmecak
>
>
HWG hwg-techniques mailing list archives,
maintained by Webmasters @ IWA