Re: XHTML Problem With Netscape 6
by "Kehvan M. Zydhek" <kehvan(at)zydhek.net>
|
Date: |
Tue, 26 Feb 2002 15:13:49 -0800 |
To: |
<cbirds(at)earthlink.net> |
Cc: |
"HWG" <hwg-techniques(at)mail.hwg.org> |
References: |
mediaone |
|
todo: View
Thread,
Original
|
|
Actually, for vspace, you're right, but for border, unless it's set in CSS
(img {border: 0px;}), images, particularly those in anchors, will have the
default border around them.
Kehvan
:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
:: NORTON ANTI-VIRUS 2002 scanned this email prior to sending. It is free
:: of any known embedded or attached viruses, trojans, or internet worms.
:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
----- Original Message -----
From: <cbirds(at)earthlink.net>
Cc: "HWG" <hwg-techniques(at)mail.hwg.org>
Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2002 14:29
Subject: Re: XHTML Problem With Netscape 6
> Kehvan M. Zydhek hunted and pecked out this message on 2/26/2002 5:02 PM
>
> >Now I'm confused... I know the validators scream "Bad! Bad! Bad! Naughty
> >programmer! Go sit in a corner!" if border="_" is in the IMG tag, but I
> >can't figure out why! Can anyone else point to the spec for why this is?
>
>
> Not sure, just guessing, but could it be that the result of using the
> vspace="0" and border="0" is the same as leaving those out altogether?
> That would make them superfluous. I don't know anything about XML so I'm
> just guessing.
>
>
HWG hwg-techniques mailing list archives,
maintained by Webmasters @ IWA