Re: Dreamweaver

Thanks for the info Mike.

=46rom the lack of response I was beginning to think that no-one used=20
DreamWeaver any more!

jalal

On Sun 22 February 2004 19:38, Michael Kear wrote:
> I'm sorry I'm getting behind in my email, but I didn't see an answer to
> this question.
>
> Yes, the DreamweaverMX2004 which is the version I use, supports relative
> positioning of Divs.  And also absolute positioning.  It handles them like
> Dreamweaver layers.
>
> The MX2004 version is well-suited to developing standards-compliant sites,
> using positioning of elements and styling with XHTML and CSS2.   I am usi=
ng
> it exclusively now to develop with, where once I used ColdFusion Studio a=
nd
> Ultra Edit (text editor) quite a lot.  I also use TopStyle for CSS editing
> because it has some great additional features I like.  Most particularly
> style sweeper which tidies up the syntax and code layout nicely the way I
> like it.
>
> Cheers
> Mike Kear
> Windsor, NSW, Australia
> AFP Webworks
> http://afpwebworks.com
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-hwg-techniques(at)hwg.org [mailto:owner-hwg-techniques(at)hwg.org] =
On
> Behalf Of jalal
> Sent: Monday, 16 February 2004 7:57 PM
> To: hwg-techniques(at)mail.hwg.org
> Subject: Dreamweaver
>
>
> Does the latest Dreamweaver support relative positioning of div's?
>
> My partner is using an older Mac version that does everything as absolute
> positioning, which means a lot of work to shift it over to relative (and
> then
> Dreamweaver won't recognize the file).
> If a later version of  DW would work in relative pos, I might persuade her
> to
> upgrade.
>
> cheers
> jalal

=2D-=20

GPG fingerprint =3D 3D45 5509 D380 26A4 523E  A9D8 A66A 5F38 CA43 BB0E

HWG hwg-techniques mailing list archives, maintained by Webmasters @ IWA