Re: Screen Resolution (was Layers Problem)

by "Shaun L. Sides" <arch(at)abts.net>

Date:	Wed, 31 May 2000 07:23:46 -0400
To:	"Hwg-Techniques" <hwg-techniques(at)hwg.org>
References:	network
	todo: View Thread, Original

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 30 May 2000, at 21:46, Andrew Dodd wrote:

> Most people I know now consider 800x600 to be the minority rather
> than the majority - but most are techies rather than designers. What
> does surprise me is how clunky 800x600 now looks. 
> 
> What do other people think?

Since I'm in the 1280x1024 camp, I have to agree.  ;-)  Unless the 
hardware is quite elderly, I don't understand why anyone would go 
less than 1024x768.

As always, your mileage may vary.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 6.5.2 -- QDPGP 2.61a
Comment: http://community.wow.net/grt/qdpgp.html

iQCVAwUBOTT2QSEw9uEAOtM/AQIgwgP/bZUbvQSw/NvH4xzYJWaDgAgFKmSMzgbm
yI+lUkqTnpLf8ZdS2ibYz2bkcWS4qVavXllaSwZSzBnfjbwyWfCKRkriaE2V7aBi
MoE5mTLb2jDPuaCAQ9X8zr1oRhirSutvmU4JeQ4Hd4jp+p3itdZw3OmOugcE9nwp
RJ2+5mJ6fe4=
=qk5V
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

HWG hwg-techniques mailing list archives, maintained by Webmasters @ IWA

This page is part of a preserved archive of archives.hwg.org. The site is no longer active and its content is not maintained. For enquiries about this archive, write to archive(at)iwanet.org.