On 13 Jan 2003, at 16:17, jim barchuk wrote:

> On Sun, 12 Jan 2003, Scott Smith wrote:
> 
> > I am certainly not pro MS. However, I must say IMHO
> > you're wasting your time on NN 4x.
> >
> > I have a small site that I feel exemplifies this
> > opinion.
> >
> > The statistics page solidifies my reasoning and can be
> > found at http://www.eagles86.com/cgi-bin/awstats.pl
> 
> Yeeesss, and I have one site that gets 1/3 NN/IE ratios,
> and another particular page that pulls a ton of people
> from WebTV.
> 
> Be aware that AOL has tons of users coming in through
> -caching- proxies that cannot reflect the true readership;
> you may have lots more NN users than you're aware of. I
> don't know what the current guesstimates are but folks
> used to mention 5x - 10x ratios. If you use the 10x then
> 30% of youe site is AOL. Of course there's always the
> issue of 'how many AOL users upgrade...'

Hmm, my parents use AOL. Only the AOL browser 
uses the AOL cache. Other browsers do not.

David
dvjones(at)ksbe.edu
 

• Web Designer Courses
• Off the Shelf Training Courses

HWG hwg-techniques mailing list archives, maintained by Webmasters @ IWA