Re: What shall we do with the W3C DOM?
by David Jones <dvjones(at)ksbe.edu>
|
| Date: |
Tue, 12 Nov 2002 12:33:38 -1000 |
| To: |
hwg-techniques(at)hwg.org |
| References: |
telocity |
| |
todo: View
Thread,
Original
|
|
On 11 Nov 2002, at 9:03, Christopher Higgs wrote:
> As for "user selection" - a choice that says
> "printer-friendly version" or "customised for voice
> browsers" would be no different to what is currently
> available. The BIG difference is that the two documents
> would come from a common source, not from different
> sources (which often results in the text-only "accessible"
> version getting out of sync with the real content).
The "real content" should already be coming from a
common source, anyway. If the common source isn't
already text-only, you have a design issue that
transcends mere presentation - for instance, if your
content is full-motion video, for instances, you need to
decide how you're going to communicate the same
information in other media (including text).
David
dvjones(at)ksbe.edu
HWG hwg-techniques mailing list archives,
maintained by Webmasters @ IWA
This page is part of a preserved archive of archives.hwg.org. The site is no longer active and its content is not maintained. For enquiries about this archive, write to archive(at)iwanet.org.