Re: analog stats.
by Aaron Choate <achoate(at)achoate.com>
|
Date: |
Wed, 05 Jan 2000 13:14:11 -0600 |
To: |
hwg-techniques(at)hwg.org |
|
todo: View
Thread,
Original
|
|
Hmmm.
Perhaps you mean a different Analog than the one I know of, but the primary
site at:
<http://www.statslab.cam.ac.uk/~sret1/analog/>
indicates that it is Year 2000 compliant.
Cheers,
Aaron Choate
At 10:55 AM 1/5/00 -0800, you wrote:
>So I've discovered that analog, or the version of analog that I'm running,
>isn't y2k compatible. And I'm also finding that searching the 'net for
>"analog stats" shows you a lot of other peoples stats. So I have no idea
>where to even look for an update if there is one.
>
>So my question. Does anyone know if I should waste my time looking? Is
>there a y2k compatible version? My customers aren't really going to be
>happy with the year reading as 19100. :)
>
>--
>Donna M. Jaggard Victoria Ferret Association
>donna(at)arwen.org vfa(at)ferret.bc.ca
>http://www.arwen.org http://www.ferret.bc.ca
>"Go away or I shall replace you with a very small shell script."
HWG hwg-techniques mailing list archives,
maintained by Webmasters @ IWA