netscape & ie
by SUrOB <leviking(at)worldonline.fr>
|
Date: |
Tue, 11 Apr 2000 19:53:53 +0200 |
To: |
envoy(at)ipa.net |
Cc: |
hwg-techniques(at)hwg.org |
References: |
fit ipa |
|
todo: View
Thread,
Original
|
|
Darryl,
For me the only reason Netscape losted share was the launch of Win95 with
IE in it ...
A lot of people thinked : why download a new browser, we have already one
with the OS
and don't forget, Netscape is not perfect, but it is the browser, why ?
It's based on Mosaic ...
Just take a look at the license in "about" in both browsers ...
Cordially,
At 09:58 10/04/00 -0500, you wrote:
>I wish there was a viable alternative to Microsoft, but no matter
>what I try, I fall back to Explorer after a few weeks because such a
>large majority of web sites look horrible through it. It's not fair.
>People should learn to code better and test across platform before
>they put their sits online. But they don't. And Netscape has never
>made any effort to accomodate that reality. Microsoft did.
>
>That's the reason Netscape lost share. Whining about unfair business
>practices on their part is a joke. Neither company particularly cares
>about the end users. But at least Microsoft puts a little thought
>into the way people surf and the environment they surf in. I
>honestly can't look at their product and believe anyone at Netscape
>has ever done that.
Julien Gre, a member of the group NYCZone
Our mission is to help people to create their own effective web site
Advices & hosting available and free on http://www.nyczone.net
HWG hwg-techniques mailing list archives,
maintained by Webmasters @ IWA