Re: side menu
by Berk/Devlin <armadill(at)earthlink.net>
|
Date: |
Fri, 01 Jun 2001 10:44:12 -0700 |
To: |
"Jason K. Chapman" <theguild(at)interserv.com>, hwg-techniques(at)mail.hwg.org |
References: |
norton |
|
todo: View
Thread,
Original
|
|
So, maybe the key is to design the site, and each page in the site, so that:
1. The navigational elements are easy enough for readers to find
2. Consistently placed
In my case, the pages are mostly text and the right-side navigation is more-colorful than most of pages, which are kind of text-heavy, so the reader's eye is attracted to the navigation.
What I like visually about the right-side navigation is that the left edge of the navigation bar is ragged and I like the way the ragged left-edge of the navigation buttons looks like next to the ragged right-edge of the text on the pages.
Rules and guidelines are nice enough, but it's -- ok -- to think different.
--Emily Berk
At 07:36 AM 6/1/01 -0400, Jason K. Chapman wrote:
>..I went with right-side navigation on my personal site originally as an experiment, but have received a number of favorable comments on keeping the navigation next to the scrollbar. As long as a site can squeeze down to 640 without a horizontal scroll, I think it makes it easier to use for the majority of people. ... Having said that, I should add that there's also a lot to be said for giving people what they expect. Certain design elements have been in such common use that they've become thought of as standards, and ease-of-use issues often revolve around controls being where people expect them to be.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
On the web at www.armadillosoft.com *** Armadillo Associates, Inc.
~ Project management, developer relations and
extremely-technical technical documentation that developers find useful.~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
HWG hwg-techniques mailing list archives,
maintained by Webmasters @ IWA