Re: seeking a second opinion: a clarification

by =?iso-8859-1?Q?St=E9phane?= Bergeron <stephberg(at)videotron.ca>

 Date:  Thu, 15 Feb 2001 17:06:17 -0500
 To:  hwg-techniques(at)hwg.org
 References:  baylogic
  todo: View Thread, Original
At 08:55 AM 15/02/01 -0800, you wrote:
>There's one trick I forgot and I don't really know if this will help with=
=20
>the SWF file size or not.  But Flash tends to add on to the size of it's=20
>FLA file as you work on it so the files become massive.  If you save the=20
>FLA file under a new name it will substantially reduce the file size.  As=
=20
>I said, this may or may not reduce your SWF file size but it would be=20
>worth a try.


Actually you can save it under the same name but by using the File>Save As=
=20
command instead.  This serves the same purpose as the File>Compact command=
=20
in Director.  I'm not sure how this impacts on the optimized .swf file=
 though.

HTH!

St=E9phane Bergeron

HWG hwg-techniques mailing list archives, maintained by Webmasters @ IWA