Re: Start with HTML or XHTML? (slightly OT)

by Andrew McFarland <aamcf(at)aamcf.co.uk>

Date:	Wed, 13 Mar 2002 19:21:56 +0000
To:	<hwg-techniques(at)hwg.org>
In-Reply-To:	mediaone
	todo: View Thread, Original

At 13:13 13/03/02 -0500, cbirds(at)earthlink.net wrote:
<snip/>
>  I would think that customers who want
>the most for their money would balk at your extra cost that is incurred
>by your using "strict" whateveitis and that it also prevents other users
>from seeing it.
<snip/>

Strict XHTML 1.0 will take less time to write and will be more widely 
viewable than, say, HTML 4.01 Transitional. One of the wonderful things 
about strict is that it degrades gracefully, most of the time. Apparently 
it also renders faster on older browsers, but I haven't personally 
investigated this.

Andrew

--
http://aamcf.co.uk/

HWG hwg-techniques mailing list archives, maintained by Webmasters @ IWA