Re: CSS in NN 4.7
by =?iso-8859-1?Q?St=E9phane?= Bergeron <stephberg(at)videotron.ca>
|
Date: |
Thu, 14 Jun 2001 07:16:27 -0400 |
To: |
"Rick Hammond" <sjcharger(at)hotmail.com> |
Cc: |
hwg-techniques(at)hwg.org |
In-Reply-To: |
hotmail |
|
todo: View
Thread,
Original
|
|
At 01:50 AM 14/06/01 -0700, you wrote:
>I had been viewing my pages in NS 4.7 with CCS disabled ooppss! Once I=20
>enabled it the images started over lapping each other (more like piling=
up).
This is a well known (and very dumb) bug in NN 4.x Your problem is that=20
you have specified some line-height for the p tag and inserted imaged=20
inside them. Why did you wrap image tags in p tags? You'd better use br=20
tags to add space between images or use CSS. If you'd have had text in=20
there it would have probably been displayed "under" the images too. When I=
=20
specify line-height I do it for the p tag only (as you did) but I make sure=
=20
no images are inserted inside any paragraphs. Also, never specify=20
line-height for body or td.
From looking at your page's code and your style sheet, I see that you use=
=20
points to size text. Points should not be used to size text on the screen=
=20
as they are a print unit that is meaningless on the screen and are very=20
inconsistent across browsers and platforms. Use pixels instead (read this=
=20
for more: http://www.alistapart.com/stories/fear4/).
>What is the subject matter that this is called so I can look it up. I=20
>recall something about "gracefully downgrading" or something like that for=
=20
>older browsers. It can be seen on=20
><http://www.geocities.com/sjcharger/index.htm>any pages of the site, with=
=20
>CSS disabled in NS 4.7
The concept is called graceful degradation and it works just fine in older=
=20
browsers (NN3, etc). You just have to be careful with NN 4.x's abysmal CSS=
=20
implementation which hasn't got one bit better in 21 incremental updates to=
=20
the browser. Hopefully, NN 6.1 will start gaining wider acceptance since=20
it's now based on the latest Mozilla build (0.9.1) as opposed to NN 6.01=20
that was based on Mozilla 0.6 or 0.7 which weren't even considered beta yet.
HTH!
St=E9phane Bergeron
HWG hwg-techniques mailing list archives,
maintained by Webmasters @ IWA