Re: Spammers/Scammers and formats used

by "Bob Laurence" <webguy(at)re-data.com>

 Date:  Fri, 10 Jan 2003 12:47:03 -0800
 To:  "Lonna Poland" <lonna(at)granbury.com>,
"HWG" <hwg-techniques(at)mail.hwg.org>
 References:  granbury
  todo: View Thread, Original
>>>>>>>>>>>>They don't take threats seriously.  The real question is.... can
anyone ever prosecute?<<<<<<<<<<<<<


It is being done all the time :)

suespammers.org

bob Laurence
www.RE-Data.com LLC
"We don't know it all, but we know the web!"

----- Original Message -----
From: "Lonna Poland" <lonna(at)granbury.com>
To: "HWG" <hwg-techniques(at)mail.hwg.org>
Sent: Friday, January 10, 2003 11:59 AM
Subject: RE: Spammers/Scammers and formats used


> Yes, but what good does it do to "threaten".  They don't take threats
> seriously.  The real question is.... can anyone ever prosecute?
> >
> > cbirds tapped out this message on 1/10/2003 2:28 PM
> >
> > >Mike Taylor tapped out this message on 1/10/2003 2:01 PM
> > >
> > >>I agree..and it's getting worse...
> > >>
> > >>I found the following article enlightening:
> > >>http://www.internetwk.com/breakingNews/INW20021219S0003
> > >>
> > >Virginia antispam statute, which
> > >                                    requires that offenders pay
> > $25,00 per
> > >                                    day of sending junk mail in
> > violation
> > >of
> > >                                    the statute.
> >
> >
> > Ooops I clicked send before I was ready.
> >
> > I was trying to say, we ALL need something like this where we can
> > threaten with fines for sending UCE that has been supposedly rejected.
>
>
>
>
>

HWG hwg-techniques mailing list archives, maintained by Webmasters @ IWA

This page is part of a preserved archive of archives.hwg.org. The site is no longer active and its content is not maintained. For enquiries about this archive, write to archive(at)iwanet.org.