RE: ALT tags
by Klaas De Waele <klaas(at)gracegraphics.be>
|
| Date: |
Fri, 8 Jun 2001 15:29:49 +0200 |
| To: |
=?iso-8859-1?Q?=27St=E9phane_Bergeron=27?= <stephberg(at)videotron.ca>, "'David.Artiss(at)boots.co.uk'" <David.Artiss(at)boots.co.uk> |
| Cc: |
"'hwg-techniques(at)hwg.org'" <hwg-techniques(at)hwg.org> |
| |
todo: View
Thread,
Original
|
|
Hey's this one's cute. I even had some fun with 80% of my documents =
where
it found no problems at all. Much faster and much more conventient =
than the
W3 online validator. Sorry to say, they really should have an offline
version and better reporting.
By the way... going through the pages, I suddenly found an error where =
I
didn't expect it, and have a question, regarding the form tag.
You all know there's this form issue where you can't have a form end
immediately after the last button (it has a default space at the =
bottom. I
solve this by doing this one:
<.table>
<.tr>
<.form>
<.td>
input types
<./td>
<./form>
<./tr>
<./table>
So really the form tags in the borders of a table. I presume this can =
be
solved with CSS? Anyone has it lying on the tip?
- KJ -
-----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
Van: owner-hwg-techniques(at)hwg.org
[mailto:owner-hwg-techniques(at)hwg.org]Namens St=E9phane Bergeron
Verzonden: vrijdag 8 juni 2001 13:00
Aan: David.Artiss(at)boots.co.uk
CC: hwg-techniques(at)hwg.org
Onderwerp: Re: ALT tags
At 09:33 AM 08/06/01 +0000, you wrote:
>Ok, my second question of the day already but I hope it's just a =
quickie...
>
>I'm bad at leaving out ALT tags. Yes, yes, I know, it probably makes =
me the
>devils child or something but I'm cleaning up my act. Does anybody =
know of
a
>simple utility that will scan my pages and prompt me for missing ALT =
tags.
I'm
>sure I used to have something. But then again I thought Arachnophilia =
had
the
>option too.
Try CSE's HTMLValidator (http://www.htmlvalidator.com). It will not =
only=20
find all missing ALT attributes but also other HTML syntax errors like=20
improperly nested tags and any other invalid markup. It's not as =
stringent=20
as the W3C Validating services but it's highly customizable and its =
error=20
messages are often less cryptic. As far as client side HTML checkers =
go,=20
it is the best there is and integrates well with a variety of HTML =
editors=20
including HomeSite and NoteTab Pro.
HTH!
St=E9phane Bergeron
=20
HWG hwg-techniques mailing list archives,
maintained by Webmasters @ IWA
This page is part of a preserved archive of archives.hwg.org. The site is no longer active and its content is not maintained. For enquiries about this archive, write to archive(at)iwanet.org.