RE: publishing from a database (MS Access Database)
by Klaas De Waele <klaas(at)gracegraphics.be>
|
| Date: |
Mon, 10 Sep 2001 09:26:25 +0200 |
| To: |
"'peter.schonefeld(at)bigpond.com'" <peter.schonefeld(at)bigpond.com>, "'Hank Marquardt'" <hmarq(at)yerpso.net> |
| Cc: |
"'hwg-techniques(at)mail.hwg.org'" <hwg-techniques(at)mail.hwg.org> |
| |
todo: View
Thread,
Original
|
|
Would like an explanation of this too. After all, mdb files are databases.
And Access is merely a tool to approach them. It's the database that runs
on the server, not Access. So okay, Access isn't the most wonderful or
powerful database access tool. I mean... I know notepad doesn't have all
the functions of word and has rendering problems, but I still consider
notepad as a very healthy and helpful tool - wouldn't want to live without.
Access databases are the ideal solution for low-cost database server
deployment (or whatever you'd call it) and offer a great platform to learn
working with SQL (even if it's just JetSQL).
- Kayjey -
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-hwg-techniques(at)hwg.org
> > [mailto:owner-hwg-techniques(at)hwg.org]On Behalf Of
> > Hank Marquardt
> > Sent: Monday, 10 September 2001 10:19 AM
> > To: Duane Ruth-Heffelbower
> > Cc: hwg-techniques(at)mail.hwg.org
> <Hank>
> > Convert the whole darned ap to a real sql
> > database (of which I don't consider
> > Access)
> </Hank>
>
> Hmmm, A big punch in the face to MS Access. I'm wondering
> what it did to deserve that ;)
>
> Hank, why don't you consider Access a "real SQL database"?
>
> Regards
> Peter
>
> -- longest to do, but then updates would
> > be real time (or staged with
> > permission/publication); whether this is a good
> > idea really depends on how
> > the workload is spread between web and non-web
> > interactions ... though a little
> > server box on an intranet bridges the need quite
> > nicely as well.
> >
> > From a dataset size perspective, 400 records in
> > nothing and well within what
> > even access can handle but if you're going to let
> > the world bang on it and look
> > at it I think you want something more robust.
> >
> > HTH
> >
> > Hank
> >
> > On Sat, Sep 08, 2001 at 09:36:57PM -0500, Duane
> > Ruth-Heffelbower wrote:
> > > I do the web work for a non-profit with about
> > 400 members who are kept track
> > > of in an Access database. The group wants to
> > make some of the membership
> > > info available on the web, names, areas of
> > practice and contact info. I have
> > > not done a database to web piece before. What
> > would be the best way to
> > > handle it, assuming updates a few times a year?
> > > __________________________________________________
> > > Duane Ruth-Heffelbower, Webmaster
> > > www.voma.org, www.vorp.org
> > > www.fresno.edu/pacs/ www.RestorativeJusticeProject.org
> > > www.RJInternational.org
> > > www.EmpoweringForReconciliation.org
> > > www.ukdw.ac.id/lpip/pspp
> > > www.peacemaking.com www.duanerh.iwarp.com
> >
> > --
> > Hank Marquardt <hank(at)yerpso.net>
> > http://web.yerpso.net
> >
> > Web & Database Development in PHP, MySQL/PostgreSQL
> > Small Office Networking Solutions - Debian
> > GNU/Linux & FreeBSD
> > PHP Instructor - HTML Writers Guild </>
> > *** Beginning PHP -- Starts August 20, 2001
> > *** /services/classes/p171.3.html
> >
> >
>
>
>
HWG hwg-techniques mailing list archives,
maintained by Webmasters @ IWA
This page is part of a preserved archive of archives.hwg.org. The site is no longer active and its content is not maintained. For enquiries about this archive, write to archive(at)iwanet.org.