RE: tables questions
by Klaas De Waele <klaas(at)gracegraphics.be>
|
| Date: |
Wed, 12 Dec 2001 09:03:26 +0100 |
| To: |
"'Freda Lockert'" <freda.lockert(at)btinternet.com>, "'hwg-techniques(at)hwg.org'" <hwg-techniques(at)hwg.org> |
| |
todo: View
Thread,
Original
|
|
> >Adobe's GoLive's proprietary tags
> >
> That comparison isn't valid. It would have been valid if the
> author had
> chosen to create the GoLive tables by the ordinary method, or
> deleted the
> grid code from the finished page. The layout grid is useful for
> prototyping but it isn't compulsory.
There's many things that aren't valid in these HTML pages. I could jump to
the defend of all programs featured here, but no use - the approach he used
is probably 'when someone would just open the program for the first time and
try to make a page, this would happen'. I can see from the code he didn't
use the programs the way they should be used. Especially GoLive and
FrontPage would score a lot better than they do now, but it does require you
to know the ins and outs of the programs...
proprietary charset code in FP
div withing table in DW
<./td> on new line in DW
p withing table in FP
...
If you know your program well, there no way it would all get so messed up.
HWG hwg-techniques mailing list archives,
maintained by Webmasters @ IWA
This page is part of a preserved archive of archives.hwg.org. The site is no longer active and its content is not maintained. For enquiries about this archive, write to archive(at)iwanet.org.