RE: BBS Recommendations
by Klaas De Waele <klaas(at)grace.be>
|
| Date: |
Tue, 18 Feb 2003 08:57:19 +0100 |
| To: |
"'Rob Atkinson'" <robatkinson(at)nucleus.com>, hwg-techniques(at)mail.hwg.org |
| |
todo: View
Thread,
Original
|
|
> Forums scripts that I know from personal experience (Server wise)
> which are not good are, Ikonboard, YaBB & UBB. They all seem to
> use more Server resources then they should -- which is because of
> the way they are coded. In fact, I do not allow them without
> pre-appoval as too many people using them on the same Server can
> bring it to its knees.
Do keep in mind you are talking about UBB.Classic here - which is flat file
based and probably one of the only one that works without a database. (!)
However, they also have UBB.X, Opentopic, UBB.Threads (the one I'm using).
All use their own system and setup, and are way friendlier on server
resources than UBB.Classic. Plus in comparison with most of the other
systems you've mentioned they are backed up by a large company that offers
true support.
Very sorry to tell that in our organisation we don't go for opensource
projects too quickly, as we've had terrible problems with that kind of
thing, even on reknown products that had a large number of users. The only
open 'stuff' we're using right now is Linux with Apache, PHP and MySQL. And
even then we're still facing some inconsistencies, although it's up to par
with paying, big-company products (which, I'll be honest, also have their
drawbacks and zillion bugs - just that you have someone to put pressure on
;)).
- Kayjey -
HWG hwg-techniques mailing list archives,
maintained by Webmasters @ IWA
This page is part of a preserved archive of archives.hwg.org. The site is no longer active and its content is not maintained. For enquiries about this archive, write to archive(at)iwanet.org.