Re: Fonts in Tables
by KeithWBell(at)aol.com
|
Date: |
Thu, 17 Aug 2000 05:26:18 EDT |
To: |
hwg-techniques(at)hwg.org |
|
todo: View
Thread,
Original
|
|
In a message dated 17/08/00 09:39:00 GMT Daylight Time, rjp(at)mail.tele.dk
writes:
> i am in favor of relative sizing
> myself and leaving the base size to the browser default. so i use
> xx-small | x-small | small | medium | large | x-large | xx-large to get
> the desired effect and it always works of the users default.
Unfortunately this method is not without its problems, too. A good discussion
is at:
http://style.metrius.com/font_size_intervals/altintervals.html
Mike Kear might find this useful too in pointing up the differences between
PC and Mac. (Take a look too at:
http://style.metrius.com/font_size/points/font_wars.GIF) While I accept there
are certain accessibility risks posed in using pixels as the unit for setting
point sizes in CSS, it's currently the only method that apparently works
reliably across all browsers and platforms.
Regards
Keith Bell
HWG hwg-techniques mailing list archives,
maintained by Webmasters @ IWA