RE: non-editable text area

by Klaas De Waele <klaas(at)gracegraphics.be>

Date:	Thu, 23 Aug 2001 14:52:26 +0200
To:	"'hwg-techniques(at)hwg.org'" <hwg-techniques(at)hwg.org>
	todo: View Thread, Original

It is also true you often find for example license or user agreements in
those non-editable textboxes.  Because you then don't have to use frames or
iframes, which are not always supported.  In some cases, non-editable user
input boxes offer a nice, easy and most of all logic solution.

- Kayjey -



> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
> Van: owner-hwg-techniques(at)hwg.org
> [mailto:owner-hwg-techniques(at)hwg.org]Namens Jim O'Brien
> Verzonden: donderdag 23 augustus 2001 13:34
> Aan: 'Kukla Fran and Ollie'
> CC: 'hwg-techniques(at)hwg.org'
> Onderwerp: RE: non-editable text area
> 
> 
> I've read several of the threads on this matter and while I 
> do agree that
> "input" boxes, etc. ARE indeed for user input, I disagree 
> that there is
> never a case where a "readonly" text box can be used and used 
> successfully.

HWG hwg-techniques mailing list archives, maintained by Webmasters @ IWA

This page is part of a preserved archive of archives.hwg.org. The site is no longer active and its content is not maintained. For enquiries about this archive, write to archive(at)iwanet.org.