RE: URL length

by Klaas De Waele <klaas(at)gracegraphics.be>

 Date:  Tue, 12 Feb 2002 17:10:53 +0100
 To:  "'John McConnell'" <form(at)narwhaldesign.com>,
"'hwg-techniques(at)hwg.org'" <hwg-techniques(at)hwg.org>
  todo: View Thread, Original
If it's ads I'd say keep it short.

No-body remembers such a long name when heard on the radion or read in some
magazine at the GP.


- Kayjey -


-----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
Van: owner-hwg-techniques(at)hwg.org
[mailto:owner-hwg-techniques(at)hwg.org]Namens John McConnell
Verzonden: dinsdag 12 februari 2002 15:06
Aan: hwg-techniques(at)hwg.org
Onderwerp: URL length


Hello everyone,

I have been going back and forth with a client about the length of a 
url for his new website.  According to an Alert Box from Jakob 
Nielsen that's 3 years old, he says names need to be short and easy 
to type.  Makes sense.  But, since people are more and more using 
bookmarks and search engines to find sites, I'm wondering if it's ok 
now for urls to be much longer and descriptive so they can be used in 
ads.  My client wants to use the url in ads and that would be the 
name of the company as well.  For instance, 
www.VermontBeautifulApartments.com instead of www.vba.com?

I was the one saying it needs to be short, but maybe it doesn't.  Any
insights.
-- 
John McConnell
Narwhal Design
126 Covered Bridge Road
North Ferrisburgh, VT  05473
802.425.7037
john(at)narwhaldesign.com
http://www.narwhaldesign.com

HWG hwg-techniques mailing list archives, maintained by Webmasters @ IWA

This page is part of a preserved archive of archives.hwg.org. The site is no longer active and its content is not maintained. For enquiries about this archive, write to archive(at)iwanet.org.