Re: To Justify or Not To Justify
by Jens Brueckmann <lists(at)j-a-b.net>
|
Date: |
Wed, 10 Mar 2004 20:02:34 +0100 |
To: |
Judith Kallos <hwg-lgmanager(at)hwg.org>, "hwg-techniques(at)hwg.org" <hwg-techniques(at)hwg.org> |
References: |
mindspring |
|
todo: View
Thread,
Original
|
|
In my opinion the big problem with justifying text for screen display is
the differing screen sizes in combination with differing word length.
One might be able to justify text perfectly for one display only
discovering that is does not work well for others, especially larger ones
as intolerable gaps appear between words that make reading the text very
hard.
Some sort of solution for long words would be using the soft hyphen,
­ (­). [1]
Another one could be using preformatting and non-proportional fonts.
But as problems may occur when using the former and nobody really wants to
write lest read large passages of monospaced text I believe that
justification is no good idea for web pages at the moment. Advancing
technology might provide us with acceptable solutions in the future.
Cheers,
jens
[1]This character is inserted into longer words to break them at the end
of lines, inserting a hyphen. This sounds good but poses a couple of
problems. The first one is, that not all browsers support this character -
Opera and Internet Explorer do, but Geckos (Mozilla, Firethingies,
Netscape) do not.
The second really big problem is that in different languages hyphenation
may lead to adding, substracting or changing characters, like in the
german word "Zucker" (sugar), which SHOULD be divided into "Zuk-ker".
Actually, browser do not know about these changes and divide this word
into "Zuc-ker".
--
Jens Brueckmann
http://www.j-a-b.net/
HWG hwg-techniques mailing list archives,
maintained by Webmasters @ IWA