Re: XHTML Strict and browser compat.

by John Starkey <jstarkey(at)advancecreations.com>

Date:	Thu, 14 Dec 2000 14:14:36 -0700 (MST)
To:	KathyW <kathyw(at)home.albury.net.au>
Cc:	hwg-techniques(at)hwg.org
In-Reply-To:	net
	todo: View Thread, Original

Ok. Thanks. I just signed on last week. Sorry about the redundancy.

On Fri, 15 Dec 2000, KathyW wrote:

> ** Reply to message from John Starkey <jstarkey(at)advancecreations.com> on Thu,
> 14 Dec 2000 08:58:51 -0700 (MST)
> 
> 
> > I'm curious if 1) anyone else is taking it to Strict, 
> 
> This came up a while ago and to summarise the general conclusion "Strict" is
> the theory, "Transitional" is the practice. If you haven't run into many
> problems then you are lucky.
> 
> > 2) if there have
> > been any real problems with it and browser compatability, 
> 
> Check the archives on the previous threads.
> 
> > Oh, and am I on the wrong list for XHTML?
> 
> Maybe languages?? This one is probably still OK though.
> 
> KathyW.
> 
> SuSE Linux 7.0 / IBM JRE1.1.8 / PolarBar Java Mailer 1.19RC11
>

HWG hwg-techniques mailing list archives, maintained by Webmasters @ IWA

This page is part of a preserved archive of archives.hwg.org. The site is no longer active and its content is not maintained. For enquiries about this archive, write to archive(at)iwanet.org.