Re: Multiple Classes ..;
by "Martin Clifford" <MLC1(at)nrc.gov>
|
Date: |
Wed, 26 Jun 2002 11:23:33 -0400 |
To: |
<Kidstevens(at)comcast.net>, <hwg-techniques(at)hwg.org>, <aesic(at)softhome.net> |
|
todo: View
Thread,
Original
|
|
It's the same thing as writing out all three classes, complete with =
padding, border, margin and font settings. It works, though I have to =
believe that it's not standards compliant. Not only that, but if you have =
a significant style sheet, than viewing it like the below would be =
incredibly confusing.
If you're going to define the same class with one attribute different in =
each, just type the whole thing out, individually. More work for you? =
Yes. Easier to understand later? Yes.
Martin
>>> Kid Stevens <Kidstevens(at)comcast.net> 06/26/02 10:43AM >>>
How many times have you pulled that one off?
At 7:54 AM -0500 6/26/02, Jeremy Duncanson wrote:
>
>
>You can keep them as seperate classes and still simplify the CSS by doing
>something like this:
>
>.classone, .classtwo, .classthree {
> padding, margin and border settings
>}
>
>.classone {
> font style
>}
>
>.classtwo {
> font style
>}
>
>.classthree {
> font style
>}
>
>
>If you were to use IDs on the elements, you could combine the CSS with
>javascript to change the styles and use just one class. It even works in =
NN
>4.x, not that all changes would get rendered. ;)
>
>Jeremy Duncanson
--=20
Sincerely,
Kid Stevens
"O! this learning, what a thing it is."
William Shakespeare
HWG hwg-techniques mailing list archives,
maintained by Webmasters @ IWA