Re: HTML Theory
by "eva" <eva(at)algonet.se>
|
| Date: |
Fri, 23 Jan 1998 23:10:57 +0100 |
| To: |
"hwg-theory" <hwg-theory(at)hwg.org> |
| |
todo: View
Thread,
Original
|
|
John M. Allen <jallen(at)thunder.ocis.temple.edu>
>HTML 2.0 and 3.2 have been obsoleted. You should not be using them. All new
>web pages should use one of the 4.0 DTDs.
Neither HTML 2.0 nor 3.2 is obsolete. Both are valid versions of HTML. For
many HTML 2.0 is still the "reigning" standard. W3C recommends, however,
usage of HTML 4.0.
Html 4.0 specification (*)
"W3C's role in making the Recommendation is to draw attention to the
specification and to promote its widespread deployment. ... W3C recommends
that user agents and authors (and in particular, authoring tools) produce
HTML 4.0 documents rather than HTML 3.2 documents. For reasons of
backwards compatibility, W3C also recommends that tools interpreting HTML
4.0 continue to support HTML 3.2 and HTML 2.0 as well.
(*) http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40
/e
HWG hwg-theory mailing list archives,
maintained by Webmasters @ IWA
This page is part of a preserved archive of archives.hwg.org. The site is no longer active and its content is not maintained. For enquiries about this archive, write to archive(at)iwanet.org.