Re: Entire site in Flash?

At 18:52 15/08/98 +0000, jayse wrote:
>But really... 
>
>what the HTML counterpart is - just a version stripped of it's glory -
>sometimes. Rather like a plaintext version of a site that also has a
>high bandwith graphics version.

*shock*
You mean it's possible for a site to still have content after you've taken
all the gimicks away :P

Sorry - I think this is actually a very good idea.  But the dual site setup
is obviously going to cost more - it is a matter of how much companies are
willing to pay to advertise their products/themselves correctly.

Since I haven't had the time nor funds to play around with Flash (I assume
it can't be _that_ different to Director 6) how does it fare with respect
to hooks for database interactivity?


Chris Higgs <c.higgs(at)landfood.unimelb.edu.au>
Institute of Land and Food Resources
University of Melbourne
http://www.landfood.unimelb.edu.au

HWG hwg-theory mailing list archives, maintained by Webmasters @ IWA