Re: A fuzzy OPINION<he's baaaack>
by Gregor Pirnaver <gregor.pirnaver(at)email.si>
|
| Date: |
Tue, 20 Feb 2001 16:10:37 +0100 |
| To: |
"Captain F.M. O'Lary" <ctfuzzy(at)canopy.net> |
| Cc: |
hwg-basics(at)hwg.org |
| References: |
canopy canopy2 |
| |
todo: View
Thread,
Original
|
|
On Tuesday 20 February 2001 01:37 Captain F.M. O'Lary wrote:
> >Who can blame them if they want to make the best site
> > they can. What is wrong with that?
>
> Anyway, option two was for the developer to load multiple
> browsers and multiple versions for the purpose of testing
> FUNCTIONALITY, and then realizing they have used stuff
> that WILL NOT be supported by viewers browsers, they post
> it to the web and bitch about a new browser version and
> how it ruined their site.
>
> I'm obviously confused. I thought option one would
> produce the "best site they can".
>
> What am I missing?
"WYSIWYG" editors and stylistic obsessions.
--=20
Gregor @ Mandrake 7.2 -> KDE 2.0 -> Kmail 1.1.99 -> ;-)
HTML: hwg-basics mailing list archives,
maintained by Webmasters @ IWA