Re: Is this all really worth it? (Was: More DTD)

This one is really really simple, and even easy to use:

Use the W3's 3.2 (final)

There are (relatively speaking) very, very few browsers that can not deal
with this reliably and predictably.

No poo, if you are looking for "clean" & "reliable" this is what you are
looking for.
Fuzzy.

At 02:47 PM 1/26/01 -0500, Kika Dube wrote:
>Paul, Don't go off your rocker, or anywhere else. You are right on target.
>Those who want their web pages to look like TV can watch 5000 channels and
>it doesnt bother me. ....but my customers want inexpensive, uncomplicated
>pages that they can understand and write content for.
>
>I find no use for the complexities....and I dont care for the unreadable
>jumbles that corporations insist on building....
>
>Thanks for putting it in your clear words. The questions remain about how
>we can have a functional standard and quidelines for the finer simpler
>code. Can somebody clarify the "right one"?
>
>Kika
>kikad(at)sover.net
______________________________________________________________
Captain F.M. O'Lary
webmaster(at)canopy.net
Another year ends.
All targets met. All systems working. All customers satisfied.
All staff eagerly enthusiastic. All pigs fed and ready to fly.
------------------------------------------------------------------

HTML: hwg-basics mailing list archives, maintained by Webmasters @ IWA