Re: HTML 4.01 Transitional vs. HTML 3.2 Final
by "Captain F.M. O'Lary" <ctfuzzy(at)canopy.net>
|
| Date: |
Sun, 04 Feb 2001 16:41:35 -0500 |
| To: |
HWG Basics <hwg-basics(at)hwg.org> |
| References: |
canopy canopy2 |
| |
todo: View
Thread,
Original
|
|
At 09:15 PM 2/4/01 +0100, Gregor Pirnaver wrote:
>On Sunday 04 February 2001 16:55 Captain F.M. O'Lary wrote:
>> Case in point:
>>
>> Just this morning, I hopped over to USAToday to see
>> what's happening in the real world. It took two restarts
>> to get the page loaded. When it did load it is (was)
>> illegible. The screen was "scrambled" with words
>> overlapping images, images overlaying text, and one
>> segment was TWO FEET off the screen to the right.
>
>Invalid HTML with CSS and JavaScript is NOT case in point!
With all due respect Gregor, ~all~ those elements can validate under the
4.x TRANSITIONAL.
Fuzzy.
______________________________________________________________
Captain F.M. O'Lary
webmaster(at)canopy.net
If we're not supposed to eat late-night snacks, why is there a light in the
refrigerator?
------------------------------------------------------------------
HTML: hwg-basics mailing list archives,
maintained by Webmasters @ IWA