Re: A little disappointed:(

by DrDougFL(at)aol.com

 Date:  Sun, 31 Oct 1999 01:05:17 EST
 To:  stealer(at)powernet.net,
hwg-critique(at)hwg.org
  todo: View Thread, Original
In a message dated 10/30/99 12:28:36 PM Eastern Daylight Time, 
stealer(at)powernet.net writes:

> http://www.yourevents.com/freemoney/

Hi,

While I do read many of the critiques posted, I don't often add my comments. 
I feel as if I am not skilled enough in HTML programming to be  a source of 
authority. But this time I must say something.

I believe that there is a reason why there was no response to your first 
request for a critique. Its called credibility. Many of the pros on here have 
a "sixth sense" as to whether or not a person is serious about learning. Some 
of these design pros may have sensed otherwise after viewing the site in 
question.

But your second request indicated you were serious, so you received replies. 
And with most of them, I agree with the critiques.

But, I also think that there is yet another critique that many of the pros 
seem to overlook. It concerns the "art" of using language, grammar and syntax 
in the body of the web site.

I've seen some excellent sites in this program. But when it comes to their 
use of the English languish, it stinks. They may be great graphical artists 
and web programmers, but when it comes to getting their point across, they 
don't have a clue. And that is a hint for you.

I wish that these web experts (and they ARE experts) in graphical design and 
analysis would learn that it takes more than a pretty picture to sell 
something on a web site. It takes a command of the English language than they 
do not know as well as their HTML coding (smile).

Sincerely,
Doug

HTML: hwg-critique mailing list archives, maintained by Webmaster @ IWA