Re: Is this cool?

Laura, agreed, as CSS it's perfectly acceptable.   Also, agreed,
when used appropriately the effcts are great.


>
>
>:bgproperties=fixed is an IE-ism, usually rather annoying since it can
cause
>:the
>:content on the page to "jump" as you scroll.   Hopefully, NN won't
include
>:this
>:non-compliant code in any of there versions   :)
>:
>:S Ross
>
>
>ok, ok, i didn't look at how they did it :).
>BODY    { background-attachment: fixed }
>is valid css1, does exactly the same thing and hopefully NN
>*will* include it, along with support for all the rest of css1
>(first) and good portions of 2 (as much as possible). A fixed
>background graphic can be quite handy in certain cases, though
>I wouldn't say this was a particularly good example.
>
>Laura Mollett
>
>

HTML: hwg-critique mailing list archives, maintained by Webmaster @ IWA