Re: frames
by Kynn Bartlett <kynn-hwg(at)idyllmtn.com>
|
Date: |
Mon, 16 Nov 1998 11:53:15 -0800 |
To: |
"David Fauteux" <phobos23(at)hotmail.com> |
Cc: |
hwg-theory(at)mail.hwg.org |
In-Reply-To: |
hotmail |
|
todo: View
Thread,
Original
|
|
At 08:24 a.m. 11/16/98 PST, David Fauteux wrote:
> I think there are very few no-frames browsers left out there. It's very
>easy to acquire a "newer" browser such as Netscape, IE or Opera. When I
>create a site with frames I don't really take into account the fact that
>the person viewing the site has a non-frames browsers as Spry or Lynx
>etc... I'm more concerned with HTML versions. I tend to create my sites
>with the idea that a person has a HTML 2.0 or 3.2 compatible browser...
>Save lot's of headaches!!
Uhm, frames aren't HTML 2.0 or 3.2 compatible. They're 4.0
compatible.
--
Kynn Bartlett <kynn(at)idyllmtn.com> http://www.idyllmtn.com/~kynn/
Chief Technologist & Co-Owner, Idyll Mountain Internet; Fullerton, California
Enroll now for my online stylesheets (CSS) class! http://www.hwg.org/classes/
The voice of the future? http://www.hwg.org/opcenter/w3c/voicebrowsers.html
HWG hwg-theory mailing list archives,
maintained by Webmasters @ IWA