Re: frames

by Kynn Bartlett <kynn-hwg(at)idyllmtn.com>

 Date:  Mon, 16 Nov 1998 11:53:15 -0800
 To:  "David Fauteux" <phobos23(at)hotmail.com>
 Cc:  hwg-theory(at)mail.hwg.org
 In-Reply-To:  hotmail
  todo: View Thread, Original
At 08:24 a.m. 11/16/98 PST, David Fauteux wrote:
> I think there are very few no-frames browsers left out there. It's very 
>easy to acquire a "newer" browser such as Netscape, IE or Opera. When I 
>create a site with frames I don't really take into account the fact that 
>the person viewing the site has a non-frames browsers as Spry or Lynx 
>etc... I'm more concerned with HTML versions. I tend to create my sites 
>with the idea that a person has a HTML 2.0 or 3.2 compatible browser... 
>Save lot's of headaches!! 

Uhm, frames aren't HTML 2.0 or 3.2 compatible.  They're 4.0
compatible.

--
Kynn Bartlett  <kynn(at)idyllmtn.com>             http://www.idyllmtn.com/~kynn/
Chief Technologist & Co-Owner, Idyll Mountain Internet; Fullerton, California
Enroll now for my online stylesheets (CSS) class! http://www.hwg.org/classes/
The voice of the future?   http://www.hwg.org/opcenter/w3c/voicebrowsers.html

HWG hwg-theory mailing list archives, maintained by Webmasters @ IWA