Re: css and hovering<morphing>

by "Ted Temer" <temer(at)c-zone.net>

 Date:  Wed, 23 May 2001 17:35:37 -0700
 To:  "HWGBASICS" <hwg-basics(at)hwg.org>
 References:  jonric canopy
  todo: View Thread, Original
Fuzzy:

You said:

> Ted, doesn't NN still get angry when you do that? Did the "new and
> improved" version (6.whatever) finally address Netscapes long standing
> issue with linked style sheets?
>>>>>>>>>

I think Tamara pretty well answered this question. However, the point I was
"trying" to make here was that Netscape has it's problems with Style Sheets
and the content therein--not with the links to them. Or at least, that has
been my experience. However, I have NOT tested the pompous statement to any
length.

But--In fact, ALL the style sheets I use are external to the page. They are
all called as needed using something similar to the following:

 <.LINK REL=StyleSheet HREF="temer-2.css" TYPE="text/css">

I was originally pointing out that sometimes, I use two or more style sheets
in the same page, ie: "temer-1.css", "temer-2.css", etc. etc.

I did--and do--this because the thing that impressed me about style sheets
was the ability to use them, much as you would use "styles" in a word
processor or page layout program. (A quick copy and paste of the tag calling
the style sheet allows one to change styles as often as you want.)

I copied the above tag from the help files of a CoffeeCup Style Sheet Maker
and it seems to work. BUT, at times -- I have tried to include some, (read -
many), attributes within a style sheet that Netscape has ignored. Of course,
Netscape pretty much ignores the same things if they were part of standard
HTML.

And BTW--one has to start sometime--so I in turn, pretty much ignore any
version of Netscape prior to 4x. It seems to me there is plenty to worry
about with Bobby, Opera and Web-TV, etc. without losing sleep over obsolete
browsers whose current share of the web is insignificant. (Less than one
percent!)

Others of course, may set their priorities differently ...

Best wishes
Ted


> At 12:14 PM 5/23/01 , Ted Temer wrote:
> [ . . . ]
> >I have used two--or even three--different CSS files on the same page. I
put
> >them in the same directory as the pages and call them as needed. Example:
> ><.LINK REL=StyleSheet HREF="temer-2.css" TYPE="text/css">
> [ . . .]
>
> Ted, doesn't NN still get angry when you do that? Did the "new and
> improved" version (6.whatever) finally address Netscapes long standing
> issue with linked style sheets?
>
> Am I interpreting you statement above correctly? You are referring to
> *external* linked style sheets, right? It is my understanding that NN 5.X
> and below, and MSIE 4.X and below,` more often as not had rendering issues
> with external style sheets.
>
> Now, with that said. I'm the first to admit that it took me some time to
> get the *priorities of reference* wired to make an external reference
> perform properly (actually I still trip on it sometimes). Until I did, I
> (often) blamed the browser for the *external* reference not working like
> the internal reference. So I can see how the browser support could have
> gotten a bad reputation at large . . . but . . . that ~was~ before I
> actually figured it out.
>
> Now I know NN (especially) has/had a problem with external references.
>
>
> >On the other hand--if one cared about Netscape--they probably would not
be
> >using Absolute Positioning in the first place.
>
> Amen.
> :-)
> Fuzzy.
> ______________________________________________________________
> Captain F.M. O'Lary
> webmaster(at)canopy.net
> "Eat a live toad in the morning and nothing worse will happen to you for
> the rest of the day."
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>

HTML: hwg-basics mailing list archives, maintained by Webmasters @ IWA